Blog

Emily Katzenberger Emily Katzenberger

Purple People and the Importance of Context and Queries

Grammar does not exist in a vacuum. Thankfully, editors usually have the context of an entire book or article to work with when they are editing, but what if they didn’t?

The lyrics to the song “The Purple People Eater” by Sheb Wooley are a prime example of why context (and querying) is important. The most popular part of the playful song states, “It was a one-eyed, one-horned, flyin’ purple people eater.”

Now, without any context, it is not necessarily clear whether the monster Wooley sings about has one eye, one horn, flies, is purple, and eats people or if the monster is eating people who have one eye, one horn, fly, and are purple. Similarly, the ambiguity could account for multiple interpretations, say a one-eyed monster that eats one-horned, flying, purple people, or any combination of the stated characteristics.

As an editor, if I were only editing this sentence alone, it would certainly be necessary to query the author for clarification. You could say that it would be absurd to think that any of those characteristics could apply to people, but clearly, the song itself seems pretty absurd (and the editor may come to regret the decision to refrain from querying the author).

Fortunately, Wooley provides clarification within the context of the rest of the lyrics. We know that the monster (not the people) in the song has one eye, one horn, and flies because the song opens with, “Well, I saw the thing comin’ out of the sky/ It had a-one long horn and one big eye.”

However, you may be surprised at an interesting turn of events when someone speaking in the song asks the monster, “Mr. Purple People Eater, what’s your line?” And the creature responds with, “Eatin’ purple people and it sure is fine.” This is a classic example of why context and querying are important. It would be reasonable to assume that the monster is purple, but when provided with more context, we discover that the monster actually eats people who are purple. It may also be purple itself, but that technically remains unknown when examining the lyrics alone.

Querying is a necessary tool in the editor’s toolkit. When context does not provide the answers a reader needs, it is our job as editors to ask authors for clarification. Otherwise, we could end up with purple monsters instead of purple people.

Read More
Emily Katzenberger Emily Katzenberger

Why Readers Need Your Books

I recently attended a virtual event where a few authors shared about their books, and the moderator asked who they write for. This is a question every author has likely asked themselves at one point or another, and it is inextricably linked to the question of who needs the books authors are writing. As a reader and editor, both are important, but I think authors can lose sight of who needs their books; they don’t always realize the impact their words have on readers, and their stories are often a guiding force in readers’ lives.

Above all else, it’s essential that an author writes for themselves. I have not yet met an author who doesn’t feel some sort of calling to their craft. No one would choose to do the extremely difficult task of creating a story without feeling some deeper motivation for wanting to do so. So, first and foremost, writers should always write for themselves. At the end of the day, your opinion of your work as an author is more valuable than anyone else’s.

In addition, many authors from marginalized backgrounds recognize that their work brings a sense of comfort and belonging to people from similar communities, especially those writing for a young adult audience. Authors that write the stories they needed to hear as an adolescent are changing the world one book at a time. In this way, their work is more meaningful than many people can express in words.

Finally, and I think this category is often overlooked, authors’ stories often have a significant and lasting impact on readers who either don’t know they have something in common with the author or who don’t have much in common with the author at all. I personally found my place within the LGBTQIA+ community and the neurodivergent community through reading (and no, books did not make me queer, they gave me a word for what I was already feeling). I’ve had the chance to interact with a couple authors whose books changed my life, and I always feel like I can’t quite convey how much their books mean to me. They are a part of me.

Similarly, we all have different experiences in this world, and sometimes our experiences do not teach us about the beauty of diversity. Again, this is how I felt growing up. I live in a predominantly white neighborhood, went to school with only a handful of students who weren’t white, didn’t know any openly queer people until college, and wasn’t exposed to religion much after my first communion (after which I gently informed my parents that I had learned everything about Christianity because the classes were becoming repetitive). Much like Jasmine in Aladdin, I experienced the world through books. Did the authors of the books I read write them for me? No, and they shouldn’t have been writing for me anyway, but I did benefit from them nonetheless. Having access to diverse books gave me a better understanding of the world and all the different people in it. Are real-world experiences more effective? Probably, but when I didn’t have that option, books were there for me.

So, for all the authors out there wondering if your books have an impact, they do! If you wrote a book from your heart, a book that you put a piece of yourself into, then someone somewhere connected with it on a deeper level. Whether it helped them feel less alone in the world, helped them understand themselves better, or helped them learn about other people, it made a difference in their lives. Writers should always write for themselves first, but never doubt the effect they have on readers in the process.

Read More